Blog Heap o'Links
Just random links galore
filed under the
Blog Heading
of
Blog Heap o'Links filed under the Blog Heading of

Constitutional Threat

Displaying 1 - 23 of 23
Zip, Weasel Zippers • Tue 2016 Jun 28, 9:59pm

…According to 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner in a post published to Slate, U.S. judges should stop studying the Constitution.

“I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation,”…

Citing Mediaite
AWR Hawkins, Breitbart • Thu 2016 Jun 9, 7:09pm

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is ruling in favor of California’s “good cause” requirement, saying the Second Amendment does not protect a right to carry a concealed gun in public…

Dan Carden, NWI Times • Sun 2016 May 15, 8:40am

INDIANAPOLIS - Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.

In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry.…

Matt Agorist, Activist Post • Tue 2016 May 10, 1:02pm

…As the SWAT team tries to enter the man’s home without a warrant, he began filming and giving them a piece of his mind.

After their verbal beating, the cops finally left but not before one of them flipped him off.…

He's more fortunate than some.

Quartering - a Daily Doodle comic

Paul Bedard, Wash Examiner • Thu 2016 Apr 28, 6:38pm

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency in 2015 decided not to deport but release 19,723 criminal illegal immigrants, including 208 convicted of murder, over 900 convicted of sex crimes and 12,307 of drunk driving…

Customs Lack-of-Enforcement, it seems.
Ben Shapiro, Daily Wire • Tue 2016 Apr 19, 12:30pm

…Here are three of the latest indicators that the left hopes to destroy the First Amendment wholesale…
1. Stopping Citizens From Being Politically Involved…
2. Prosecuting People For Giving To Causes…
3. Destroying People For Failing To Comply With The Leftist Social Agenda…

Bare Naked Islam • Fri 2016 Apr 8, 5:46pm

How many Muslim invaders living on welfare did the Obama Regime resettle in your state and home town in 2015?…

Smug O
George Hewes, The Black Sphere • Wed 2016 Feb 3, 10:14pm

…Senate Joint Resolution 26, was authored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The official purpose of the bill is to authorize the use of military force against the Islamic State. However, its vague language would give Obama sweeping new controls of the U.S. military and de facto martial law powers, the very power that give authority to the chief executive to suspend elections in a time of crisis.…

Tim Devaney, The Hill • Sat 2016 Jan 23, 10:32am

Gun manufacturers could be sued by victims of gun violence under new legislation from Democrats.

The Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act would roll back long-standing protections enjoyed by the gun industry that shields it from many lawsuits.…

Note the faulty logic by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.):

…“If you’re a carmaker and your airbags kill someone, you’re potentially liable… If you’re a pharmaceutical company and sell faulty drugs, you can be held liable. If you’re a liquor store and sell alcohol to minors, you can be held liable."

If you're a gun manufacturer and you make guns that work exactly as intended, though, somehow this is equivalent? These evil, traitorous, lying gun-grabbers never quit.
Pamela Geller • Fri 2015 Oct 2, 1:37pm

…Yesterday, Loretta Lynch announced before the United Nations that the Attorney General’s office, in collaboration with several US cities, will form a global law enforcement initiative called the Strong Cities Network. This is the implementation of UN rules and laws on US soil, bypassing Congress and circumventing the Constitution. …

Dedicated Tenther • Mon 2015 Jun 29, 11:24pm

The United States flag is never to be flown upside down except in times of great distress or emergency. I believe we are in both. We are in a perilous time in which the Supreme Court has decided on the one hand that the plain language of a law is not binding – that the Justices can read the minds of those who wrote the law, and that the will of the People is not binding upon them. In short, the United States Supreme Court has just announced that we are no longer a Constitutional Federal Republic, that we are not even a Representative Democracy. We are an oligarchy ruled ultimately by unelected, unaccountable judges who can now dictate law and ignore the Constitution and the will of the People.

Michael Snyder, End of the American Dream • Tue 2015 Jun 9, 9:22am

Does the Army expect that there will soon be “disaster stricken” areas all over the country? As you will see in this article, a job advertisement has been posted on a federal website seeking workers that “will provide emergency support to disaster stricken areas throughout the US“.…

When the government advertised for help with an influx of immigrant children, we then got an influx of immigrant children. Now the government advertises for help with widespread disaster…
Russ Hepler, Federalist Papers Project • Sun 2015 May 3, 4:57pm

“We in the United States actually have freedom of religion, not freedom of worship,” Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told Johnson yesterday during a Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing.

Lankford was referring to the department’s decision to include “freedom of worship” instead of “freedom of religion” as a basic American right listed in the civics test that all immigrants must take to become a naturalized U.S. citizen. …

[Video, 0:57, SenatorLankford, YouTube]

Sen. Mike Lee, The Federalist • Fri 2015 Apr 24, 8:24am

…The U.S. Congress no longer passes most federal laws, rules, and regulations. Instead, about 99 percent of the rules we must live by issue from an army of unelected federal bureaucrats. Using a classic duck-and-dodge strategy, Congress routinely enacts legislation that purports to solve a genuine problem, but then delegates to these executive-branch bureaucrats the power to make the legally binding rules that determine the law’s real-world impact. It’s a brilliant plan; Congress gets all the credit for the popular goal and none of the blame for a regulation’s controversial—and expensive—particulars. …

Jeff Dunetz, Truth Revolt • Thu 2015 Feb 19, 3:58pm

Megyn Kelly, Fox News, interviewing Luis Gutierrez [Video]

"Why don't you just answer the question, sir?"
"I don't want your repertoire. I want an answer to my question."
"You're dodging."
Finally she could take no more:
Kelly: We're out of time. If you want to hear more from Congressman Gutierrez, I'm sure you can do it on the Congressional floor.

Mark J Fitzgibbons, Wash. Examiner • Thu 2015 Feb 19, 7:35am

The growth in number and size of government agencies, beginning about 80 years ago, has been accompanied by the expanded use of “administrative subpoenas.” These are warrants, not signed by a judge, by which government obtains records and other evidence.

More and more Americans have come to understand that these administrative subpoenas violate the Fourth Amendment’s processes….

Obamanana
Dave Boyer, Washington Times • Fri 2014 May 23, 11:58am

At a Democratic fundraiser in Chicago Thursday night, Mr. Obama told a small group of wealthy supporters that there are several hurdles to keeping Democrats in control of the Senate and recapturing the House. One of those problems… "Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of Senate seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage…" [That pesky old Constitution again.]

Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit • Sat 2012 Jul 14, 5:12pm

Tea Party activists didn’t appreciate Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) telling them, “if all you do is stand for the Constitution you will lose.”
Watch the fireworks: YouTube

C. Edmund Wright, American Thinker • Fri 2012 Jun 29, 1:30pm
"Under [my] theory, the mandate is not a legal command to buy insurance," Roberts wrote. "Rather, it makes going without insurance just another thing the Government taxes, like buying gasoline or earning income."

Huh?

Yes, Roberts actually wrote those words in what will certainly go down as his most famous and studied work ever. Our Ivy League-credentialed chief justice just wrote that going without insurance can be taxed just like income and buying gas, without realizing that many people do not make income or buy gas.

It must have escaped Roberts that you can avoid making income -- which is ironic, since many of the folks celebrating his ruling avoid just that. And he missed that you can also avoid buying gas. Heck, Obama's energy secretary avoids that. But now, under Roberts's own theory and using Roberts's own words, you and I cannot avoid buying insurance without being taxed as a result. And as we mentioned, our Treasury secretary -- not to mention the former Ways and Means Committee chair -- manages to avoid being taxed.

ikonabass on YouTube • Wed 2012 Apr 25, 3:09pm

Dodd-Frank... gives dictatorial power to new agencies and allows unlimited collecting and sharing of your information. The agencies have no accountability to congress or voters. [Video]

Bruce McQuain, Questions and Observations • Sat 2012 Mar 17, 5:13pm
In her dissenting opinion, however, Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod said she disagrees with the majority’s conclusion that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect an individual’s right to a specific firearm unless the government has prevented that person from acquiring others.

Elrod argued the majority impermissibly treated the Second Amendment as a "second-class right" by carving out an exception.

"It is particularly unfortunate for our circuit to endorse the atextual, ahistorical rule that the Second Amendment does not protect particular firearms," she wrote.

...this is government deciding it can violate the property rights of a gun owner whenever it wishes too with no penalty for doing so....

nytimes.com • Sat 2009 Apr 11, 7:56pm

"I frankly don't understand all the brouhaha lately from Congress and even from some of my colleagues about referring to foreign law...." [Oh, nothing. Just a little matter of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!]

worldnetdaily.com • Tue 2009 Apr 7, 9:40pm

Activists seeking to eliminate the Electoral College in favor of a popular vote to elect the president boast that their movement is almost one-fifth the way to its goal.