Radical Incline Posts

Posts
Subscribe to Radical Incline | Mindful Webworks
Full Radical Incline posts, latest on top
Page 35 of 58, posts 171 - 175 of 286
Radical Incline

Obama's Comic Timing

The President's mastery of comedic timing is matched only by his famous falsetto crooning.




Radical Incline

A Connecticut Yankee on Wages

They stood for "protection," and swore by it...

"While it would take far too long to correct the president's many fallacies and errors, his desire to raise the minimum wage to $9 per hour stood out as one of his most damaging proposals."
Robert Taylor at PolicyMic.com

ill., Gutenberg.org

It isn't what sum you get, it's how much you can buy with it, that's the important thing...A thing which naturally interested me, as a statesman, was the matter of wages. I picked up what I could under that head during the afternoon. A man who hasn't had much experience, and doesn't think, is apt to measure a nation's prosperity or lack of prosperity by the mere size of the prevailing wages; if the wages be high, the nation, is prosperous; if low, it isn't. Which is an error. It isn't what sum you get, it's how much you can buy with it, that's the important thing; and it's that that tells whether your wages are high in fact or only high in name. I could remember how it was in the time of our great civil war in the nineteenth century. In the North a carpenter got three dollars a day, gold valuation; in the South he got fifty — payable in Confederate shinplasters worth a dollar a bushel. In the North a suit of overalls cost three dollars — a day's wages; in the South it cost seventy-five — which was two days' wages. Other things were in proportion. Consequently, wages were twice as high in the North as they were in the South, because the one wage had that much more purchasing power than the other had.

I rigged up my pile-driver, and allowed myself fifteen minutes to drive him into the earth — drive him all in — drive him in till not even the curve of his skull should show above-ground. Here is the way I started in on him. I asked:

"What do you pay a pound for salt?"

"A hundred milrays."

"We pay forty. What do you pay for beef and mutton — when you buy it?" That was a neat hit; it made the color come.

"It varieth somewhat, but not much; one may say seventy-five milrays the pound."

"We pay thirty-three. What do you pay for eggs?"

"Fifty milrays the dozen."

"We pay twenty. What do you pay for beer?"

"It costeth us eight and one-half milrays the pint."

"We get it for four; twenty-five bottles for a cent. What do you pay for wheat?"

"At the rate of nine lumdred milrays the bushel."

"We pay four hundred. What do you pay for a man's tow-linen suit?"

"Thirteen cents."

"We pay six. What do you pay for a stuff gown for the wife of the laborer or the mechanic?"
I looked around on the company with placid satisfaction, for I had slipped up on him gradually and tied him hand and foot...

"We pay eight cents, four mills."

"Well, observe the difference: you pay eight cents and four mills, we pay only four cents." I prepared now to sock it to him. I said: "Look here, dear friend, what's become of your high wages you were bragging so about a few minutes ago?" — and I looked around on the company with placid satisfaction, for I had slipped up on him gradually and tied him hand and foot, you see, without his ever noticing that he was being tied at all. "What's become of those noble high wages of yours ? — I seem to have knocked the stuffing all out of them, it appears to me."

But if you will believe me, he merely looked surprised, that is all! He didn't grasp the situation at all, didn't know he had walked into a trap, didn't discover that he was in a trap. I could have shot him, from sheer vexation. With cloudy eye and a struggling intellect he fetched this out:

"Marry, I seem not to understand. It is proved that owe wages be double thine; how then may it be that thou'st knocked therefrom the stuffing? — an I miscall not the wonderly word, this being the first time under grace and providence of God it hath been granted me to hear it."

Well, I was stunned; partly with this unlocked for stupidity on his part, and partly because his fellows so manifestly sided with him and were of his mind — if you might call it mind. My position was simple enough, plain enough; how could it ever be simplified more? However, I must try:

"Why, look here, brother Dowley, don't you see? Your wages are merely higher than ours in name, not in fact."

"Hear him! They are the double — ye have confessed it yourself."

"Yes-yes, I don't deny that at all. But that's got nothing to do with it; the amount of the wages in mere coins, with meaningless names attached to them to know them by, has got nothing to do with it. The thing is, how much can you buy with your wages? — that's the idea. While it is true that with you a good mechanic is allowed about three dollars and a half a year, and with us only about a dollar and seventy-five — "

"There — ye're confessing it again, ye're confessing it again!"

"Confound it, I've never denied it, I tell you! What I say is this. With us half a dollar buys more than a dollar buys with you — and therefore it stands to reason and the commonest kind of common sense, that our wages are higher than yours."

He looked dazed, and said, despairingly:

"Verily, I cannot make it out. Ye've just said ours are the higher, and with the same breath ye take it back."

"Oh, great Scott, isn't it possible to get such a simple thing through your head? Now look here- let me illustrate. We pay four cents for a woman's stuff gown, you pay eight cents four mills, which is four mills more than double. What do you allow a, laboring-woman who works on a farm?"

"Two mills a day."

"Very good; we allow but half as much; we pay her only a tenth of a cent a day; and — "

"Again ye're conf — "

"Wait! Now, you see, the thing is very simple; this time you'll understand it. For instance, it takes your woman forty-two days to earn her gown, at two mills a day — seven weeks' work; but ours earns hers in forty days — two days short of seven weeks. Your woman has a gown, and her whole seven weeks' wages are gone; ours has a gown, and two days' wages left, to buy something else with. There — now you understand it!"

He looked — well, he merely looked dubious, it's the most I can say; so did the others. I waited — to let the thing work. Dowley spoke at last — and betrayed the fact that he actually hadn't gotten away from his rooted and grounded superstitions yet. He said, with a trifle of hesitancy:

"But — but — ye cannot fail to grant that two mills a day is better than one."

Shucks! Well of course, I hated to give it up. So I chanced another flyer:

"Let us suppose a case. Suppose one of your journeymen goes out and buys the following articles;

"1 pound of salt;
1 dozen eggs;
1 dozen pints of beer;
1 bushel of wheat;
1 tow-linen suit;
5 pounds of beef;
5 potmds of mutton.

"The lot will cost him thirty-two cents. It takes him thirty-two working days to earn the money — five weeks and two days. Let him come to us and work thirty-two days at half the wages; he can buy all those things for a shade under fourteen and a half cents; they will cost him a shade under twenty-nine days' work, and he will have about half a week's wages over. Carry it through the year; he would save nearly a week's wages every two months, your man nothing; thus saving five or six weeks' wages in a year, your man not a cent. Now I reckon you understand that 'high wages' and 'low wages' are phrases that don't mean anything in the world until you find out which of them will buy the most!"

It was a crusher.

No, I had to give it up. What those people valued was high wages; it didn't seem to be a matter of any consequence to them whether the high wages would buy anything or not.But, alas ! it didn't crush. No, I had to give it up. What those people valued was high wages; it didn't seem to be a matter of any consequence to them whether the high wages would buy anything or not. They stood for "protection," and swore by it, which was reasonable enough, because interested parties had gulled them into the notion that it was protection which had created their high wages. I proved to them that in a quarter of a century their wages had advanced but thirty per cent., while the cost of living had gone up one hundred; and that with us, in a shorter time, wages had advanced forty per cent, while the cost of living had gone steadily down. But it didn't do any good. Nothing could unseat their strange beliefs.

From Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
page 303 and page 332 of Archive.org - Corrections made for apparent OCR errors.
Belatedly discovered also at Gutenberg.org, where I got the illustration (not related to the quotes but from the same chapter).



Radical Incline

Obama and Sons

He's like our Dad. Engaging in child abuse.

Obama and Sons

The graphic is unsigned. Understandably.

Chris Rock: "President of the United States is our boss, but he is also... you know, the president and the first lady are kinda like the mom and the dad of the country."
-Joe Newby, Examiner.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCuRICh4IcU

Barack Obama: "If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon" [Martin, the thug shot to death while beating up on an innocent man].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcJVRNh3bRM

Alphonoso Rachel on Chris Rock's comments:



Radical Incline

The President Learns Gun Control

Tricks for learning to hit what you aim at

I was late jumping on this invitational bandwagon,
thanks to my overstressed, antiquated video churn.
Here's what other webworkers have done meanwhile:
Lisa Palinista Luerssen's Photos, c/o Anna Puma (+SmuD) on Ace of Spades
Twitchy links
I Own the World
An animagraphic c/o jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright's Sock Puppet on Ace of Spades
By karebair1 Karen Schuler, c/o Jones in CO on Ace of Spades
By dmataconis Doug Mataconis, c/o Buzzsaw on Ace of Spades
YouTube vid by RawInstinctHD showing what would really happen holding a rifle that way, c/o jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright's Sock Puppet again, on Ace of Spades
New York Post gets into it, c/o target="_blank">FenelonSpoke on Ace of Spades
Is the original a fake? by Steve Sheldon at Clash Daily, c/o Granny Jan and Jihad Kitty on Ace of Spades
Moonbattery has several good ones.
More good ones at PoliNation.
An excellent collection on Moonbattery
And one by Seamus Muldoon
The People's Cube c/o sTevo on Ace
Good one by kesgardner Ken Gardner, h/t Niedermeyer's Dead Horse on Ace
Hope 'n' Change Cartoons
This one on Photobucket includes the LA cop-killer. H/t RWC on Ace.



Radical Incline

When Conspiracy Comes Knocking On Your Door

In New World Order, YouTube Watches You

This is interesting.

I was looking at YouTube's recommended channels, following links to the likes of CinemaSins and ScreenJunkies. Down a ways, I saw ThinkOutsideTheTV, and clicked it blindly.

Turned out, it was a Sandy Hook conspiracy site started 2013 Jan 7 (Country: Canada).

There were six videos up, including "Sandy Hook Fully Exposed,"
Pt1 tnpart 1 uploaded 3 weeks ago, about 30min long, 11,785,543 views, and

Pt2 tnpart 2 uploaded 1 week ago, less than 20min, 202,275 views.

As an appetizer, I first watched the 2-min Shooter tnSandy Hook Shooter Dead Before Shooting??? Some website had the shooter's death date as a day early. Potential clerical error. Lame.

Other than a couple of things picked up along the way from semi-conspiratorializing Alex AlexJones Jones, like Why People Think Sandy Hook is A Hoax, and this strangeness, "Sandy Hook" Name Seen on 'Dark Knight' Map, I really had no idea what the Sandy Hook "Hoax" might be about, other than as anti-Constitutional exploitation.

So, I started watching Sandy Hook Exposed Part 1. Although many points left my skeptical side working overtime with Reasonable Explanations, there was some intriguing stuff that left me wanting more fals- or ver-ification. (As is often the case in all kinds of reports, I'd rather have had less editorializing "see? see?" and more straightforward presentation.)

About half-way through my viewing of Part 1, when the accumulation of oddities actually began to be intriguing, the screen suddenly goes into YouTube greyscreen, that static-y screen with the message "This video is not available." The video had been showing bits from other folks' videos, so at first I thought the grayscreen was part of the video about some other video being taken down, but, no, the video I was watching had disappeared right while I was watching it.

That video is unavailable.

Now that's the kind of thing that will get your conspiratorial gears turning. Cue sinister music.

Sure, I can make up a lot of reasons why YouTube, or a poster, might have yanked the video coincidentally just as I was watching a video… about conspiratorial manipulation of the public. (After nearly 12 million views, I can't imagine the poster yanking it in this case.)

I checked again, and both part 1 and now part 2 fail to display. The other videos from the channel are still displaying. Whoops, no, that other one's gone, too... this one's still here... for now...
I was able to watch the rest of Part 1 and all of Part 2, though. (There's sometimes workarounds on the Infratoobz.) There's some weird stuff right there.

Conspiracy theories are usually longer on theory than substance. There are some undeniable oddities about JFK's and RFK's assassinations, among others, there are some questions I formulated watching TV that April day in Oklahoma City, that I and apparently a lot of other people still want answered. There are in fact consciousless conspirators out there who would think nothing of perpetrating assassination, mass murder, and war, a TWA800, a Pearl Harbor, or a 9/11. for profit or power. One tries to keep the balance between that understanding and the many allegations of their achievements. I don't have any problem believing that the 9/11 attacks went much as reported, no bombs, no rockets, no missle into the Pentagon, no hidden families of the Pennsylvania crash victims, Bush himself was not running the planes using a Wii. But there are some strange things. Ever hear how quickly they found Muhammed Atta's passport, just lying around, and connected all the dots? Weird. (Oh, sorry, it was somebody else's. Atta's was an erroneous report. So they say. But "Muhammed Atta's Passport" would still make the better name for a punk rock band.)

Look at that two-part Sandy Hook video, though, and clarify for me what is real. Oh, wait, you can't. They're "not available."

Interesting.

Oddly enough, the next YouTube site I attempted to access showed only the first frame (which the OutsideTheTV vids did not), and then also said those videos were inaccessible. So, I had to do workarounds to see what BikinisTokyo was. (The one I watched was Cute, but, Yawn.)

So, what the…? Other less random videos show up fine. Is it just me, or is my Faraday cage hat too tight?

Then I rebooted my computer, and everything showed up fine in my browser again. I think my old XT system has codec problems. If I use the video editing program or the video viewing program, sometimes the YouTube player in the browser gets weird using my favorite but fifth-most-popular browser.

We can stop the sinister music now.

Or… can we?




Pages