Articles repeated from the blog heap are
used to give context to political cartoons from the days of the worldwide
cartoon riots, Feb 2006. The cartoons are republished here as overview of the
genre and as an aid to study of the development of cartooning's cycle during
this period. All cartoons are from http://www.ucomics.com/editorials/.
Unlike the regular blogheap, this page is in sequential order from
top to bottom.
THE CARTOONIST FATWA SCALE The cartoons below are rated 1 to 5 on their degree of the
cartoonist's self-endangerment. There is no rating zero because we assume that
any cartoonist who even makes the most oblique reference to the any aspect of
the cartoon crisis is going to cause someone somewhere to be offended to the
point of murder.
Doug Marlette has a dark take on the success of the protestors.
Is that supposed to be Chamberlain?
MON 2006-FEB-06
Wayne Stayskal manages a mildly funny angle
Chan Lowe seems ambiguous on the value of liberty of
expression
Walt Handelsman meekly points up the absurdity of the "threat"
of cartoons.
Ted Rall, in his inimitable marvelous manic rage, brings it on
home. (This gets only one Cartoonist Fatwa point, but the scale does not
encompass Ted's home-grown foes).
Doug Marlette takes on the moral hypocrisy. Extra points for
You-Know-Who.
Stuart Carlson, while seeming to demean the Danish cartoonists,
nevertheless well slams the moral hypocrisy.
David Horsey is too close to current reality (see Marlette's
"Life has become a cartoon" above).
Dick Locher in one of many cartoonist self-references
Wayne Stayskal in one of many cartoonist self-references, with
a domestic politics twist. Even funnier in light of the many
"Arkancides"...
Don Wright in one of many cartoonist self-references, but
funny
Jack Ohman in one of many cartoonist self-references. Not sure
how to take the self-revealing aspect of this one (substitute Jack Ohman for Al
Schlub), but it does speak for many, and to the issue of terror used to
suppress the free expression of ideas.
Lalo Alcaraz seems to believe something good has been done by
the cartoonists, somewhat opposite of the take many have on this.
Matt Davies isn't quite right. In reality, most cartoonists
are controlled, by the editors and publishers. (Let's ask Ted
Rall.)
Ben Sargent best explains civilization. Let's hope that
fellow's listening!
Dick Locher also turns the issue to domestic politics
Pat Oliphant isn't going to let you know where he stands, but
he gets full Fatwa points just in case.
Ted Rall is so out there! He has leftish presuppositions, but
mostly he's like Mad Magazine of old, anyone is fair game, and almost always
excellently skewered. Rall is free to go in any direction, not just a
particular hard slant on political or current events, as with the excellent
self-referential cartoon above, and this sci-fi extrapolation of the current
cartoon crisis, featuring his hilarious recurring Generalissimo Bush.