Articles repeated from the blog heap are used to give context to political cartoons from the days of the worldwide cartoon riots, Feb 2006. The cartoons are republished here as overview of the genre and as an aid to study of the development of cartooning's cycle during this period. All cartoons are from http://www.ucomics.com/editorials/.
Unlike the regular blogheap, this page is in sequential order from top to bottom.
The cartoons below are rated 1 to 5 on their degree of the cartoonist's self-endangerment. There is no rating zero because we assume that any cartoonist who even makes the most oblique reference to the any aspect of the cartoon crisis is going to cause someone somewhere to be offended to the point of murder.
Doug Marlette has a dark take on the success of the protestors. Is that supposed to be Chamberlain?
MON 2006-FEB-06
Wayne Stayskal manages a mildly funny angle
Chan Lowe seems ambiguous on the value of liberty of expression
Walt Handelsman meekly points up the absurdity of the "threat" of cartoons.
Ted Rall, in his inimitable marvelous manic rage, brings it on home. (This gets only one Cartoonist Fatwa point, but the scale does not encompass Ted's home-grown foes).
Doug Marlette takes on the moral hypocrisy. Extra points for You-Know-Who.
Stuart Carlson, while seeming to demean the Danish cartoonists, nevertheless well slams the moral hypocrisy.
David Horsey is too close to current reality (see Marlette's "Life has become a cartoon" above).
Dick Locher in one of many cartoonist self-references
Wayne Stayskal in one of many cartoonist self-references, with a domestic politics twist. Even funnier in light of the many "Arkancides"...
Don Wright in one of many cartoonist self-references, but funny
Jack Ohman in one of many cartoonist self-references. Not sure how to take the self-revealing aspect of this one (substitute Jack Ohman for Al Schlub), but it does speak for many, and to the issue of terror used to suppress the free expression of ideas.
Lalo Alcaraz seems to believe something good has been done by the cartoonists, somewhat opposite of the take many have on this.
Matt Davies isn't quite right. In reality, most cartoonists are controlled, by the editors and publishers. (Let's ask Ted Rall.)
Ben Sargent best explains civilization. Let's hope that fellow's listening!
Dick Locher also turns the issue to domestic politics
Pat Oliphant isn't going to let you know where he stands, but he gets full Fatwa points just in case.
Ted Rall is so out there! He has leftish presuppositions, but mostly he's like Mad Magazine of old, anyone is fair game, and almost always excellently skewered. Rall is free to go in any direction, not just a particular hard slant on political or current events, as with the excellent self-referential cartoon above, and this sci-fi extrapolation of the current cartoon crisis, featuring his hilarious recurring Generalissimo Bush.